Advertisement
If the beacon was left by the 13th tribe as a signpost to Earth, but it was lethal to cylons...and they were cylons...why did they leave it?
Or is it simply that it did not originally have the virus on it? It supposedly got on there by accident right? One of them sneezed or something. But...cylons do not sneeze....
....or....huh?
That all being said (muttered?) I still like this episode.
Or is it simply that it did not originally have the virus on it? It supposedly got on there by accident right? One of them sneezed or something. But...cylons do not sneeze....
....or....huh?
That all being said (muttered?) I still like this episode.
posted by:
|
Washington
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: The beacon in Season 3 that killed the cylons
Mon, October 26, 2009 - 11:38 PMFace it. They didn't have a plan.
But, yes, this is another plot hole that you could drive a truck through. -
-
Re: The beacon in Season 3 that killed the cylons
Tue, October 27, 2009 - 4:54 AMTedward is right. It matches up with the continuity of season 2 but makes no sense in the context of season 4. -
-
Re: The beacon in Season 3 that killed the cylons
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 3:25 PMEither that or the concept that the 13th Tribe was indeed Cylon in the first place, was the reason the pathogen infected them so viciously? -
-
Re: The beacon in Season 3 that killed the cylons
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 3:28 PMAlso, as I noted before -- the Producers and Writers did borrow much from War of the Worlds.
Then again, there is not much Science Fiction that does not. That being stated, I've noted the theme of the biological aspects of Cylon technology has a akin analogy?
-
-
-
